suggestion to bros when giving scores

Today in another post, the topic of scoring came up again. I belong to the camp of conservative scorers who are dismayed by bros who give overly generous scores. IMHO over-generous scores erode the reliability of the entire x/10 scoring system that most of us rely on. It used to be that 7/10 is a good score, but scoring inflation has made it that now at least a score 8/10 is required to generate any interest while 7/10 is now deemed a bad score. Some bros i've noticed (without naming names), if you average out the scores they give, the average MM will get 8.5 or higher. Now this is simply too high. So here's my suggestion, just to make things easy. Each bro should tell us, what score they would give to an MM they consider to be just average, or what score the median (out of all the MMs they've sampled) would be. Example: If a bro said, an average MM who ranks just in the middle of all the MMs he has ever sampled is 7.5/10, then we would know that a 8/10 coming from this bro isn't that great of a score. On the other hand, if another bro tells us, the face score he would give to an average MM whom he considers neither ugly nor pretty is 5/10, then we know that coming from this bro, a 6/10 is a good score. We will also know that a facially 6/10 MM coming from the second bro will actually be prettier than a facially 8/10 coming from the first bro.