queena@toe

I was excited the whole day to try this girl based on her picture and then the review posted by kleung14. What wolf wouldn't like to bang a pretty girl with huge tits and a small waist. Well, after I saw her...I realized Kleugh14 is probably shilling or he must be a really ugly troll that thinks any girl is pretty. I don't understand how he can rate her higher then emma and barbie for face? Anyways, after I saw her she is nothing as described by kleung or anything representative of the photo except for the tits. My ratings are (might be subjective but add or minus 1 depending on your preference: Face: 7 (she is definitely not prettier than emma or barbie. She has a surgically made nose that looks very obvious and her face shape is not nice) Body:6 (she doesn't have a body close to what the pictures look like. They probably took the pictures from angles that made her body look better than normal. Her tits are huge..thats probably the best part. They are very similar to I-U's tits (becky). Her legs are very thin and she does not have a small waist. She also has a bit of a belly. No curves at all. Body no where as nice as emma or barbie. Personally, I like barbie's body the best. Service: 8.5 (Even though she wasn't as I imagined, her service was great. Even though I was unsatisfied with her looks, her service was great so I gave her a 20 dollar tip). Repeat: No way, I only repeat girls that have great service and that I'm attracted to. Would I recommend, probably not unless you like huge tits on a really really short girl. I don't think she is 5'3 as listed, more like 4'11 or 5'0, she stood up to my shoulder.