Why some reviews end up with different outcomes for different hunters

My friend and eye were talking the other day why some bros that have similar preferences for women (eg, look, face, style, pse vs gfe, service and attitude) may still have different outcomes for the same mm.  Unless the hunter themself performs the same and look exactly the same the outcome will always feel different. I had a session with a mm where after I blow my load she will remove the bag and suck my jj for maybe 30 seconds....felt like heaven .  I didn't ask for the bag off and extra suction, she just didn't on her own.  The session was awesome for me (and I think she enjoyed it too or she was good at faking it). I'm not a selfish guy so I told a close hunting friend of mine that this girl is my type and should be his type since we have similar preferences in all aspects. He went to give her a try and received an average session only.  She didn't remove the bag and provide the 30s of suction, she didn't do a lot of stuff she did with me.  He said she wasn't cold, but it didn't sound like the session I had with her. This also happens sometimes to me for the mm he recommends to me. There is YMMV, because bros look different, mm have different feel for different bros and unless the mm is highly professional and trained to be like a sex machine where they consistently provide very little variabilty in their attitude and service (I think this is rare Wynn, etc...). Bros also need to look at how they look when they look in the mirror.  Is the hunter in shape and attractive to females? or is the hunter  butt ugly?  This might not make much difference to some mm, but to some semi pros / pros it might. What do your hunters / bros think?  Is this a stupid assumption on my part?