score inflation and scoring standards

http://sex网站.com/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=9853&page=1#pid123502 Recently I wrote a review for Rita@桃色娃娃谷 andsome brothers have PM me to ask if she is ugly since I gave her a “low”score for facial beauty of “only”7.5. I want clarify that 7.5 is nota low score. For comparison, the super popular Emma@TOE88 would score 8.5 under my standards. I want to speak about what I perceive as “score inflation”.Brother Lotusau88 recently told us his scoring standards where any female thatis not facially deformed (has a nose, mouth, pair of eyes and ears) willautomatically have a base score of 7. Meanwhile some other brothers haveshowered certain Kimchis with super generous scores of 9s and 10s across theboard. Don’t want to start a war of words with anybody, but to see what I’mtalking about, look at the recent reviews for Haru@ED. Some brothers are evenwriting multiple reviews for the same MM to sing their praises. Obviously these reviewers have their freedom to say whatthey want and Ben gor will be the final arbitrator of whether that will beallowed or not. IMHO, it is not a goodtrend. Are those glowing reports written simply because thatbrother is madly in love with the MM? Or is it because the MM or keeper knowstheir forum handle and rave reviews are written as either a favour or part ofan explicit bargain? I really don’t know. What I do know is that score inflation is rampant. A 10/10score equals perfection. Service 10/10 means the service was so good that itcan’t possibly be any better, but is that really possible? Have you ever hadsex so good that you can’t possibly get anything better for the rest of yourlife? We don’t have to talk about those that give 11/10 or 12/10. Those reviewsshould be immediately deleted as a blatant promotion. Seriously, we must really do something about the problem ofthrough the roof type scores that some brothers here love to give. Veteranhunters may not be affected, but new hunters will be misled. It also leads toan “arms race” where different garages try to entice their customers intogiving rave reviews. Honest garages will be left in the dust. The usefulnessand integrity of the discussion forum will be undermined. My scoring guide for appearance0/10 theoretical limit for ugliness, never seen before1-2/10 extreme ugliness, makes me want to run away in fear or disgust 3/10 ugly 4/10 slightly unattractive 5/10 typical girl, neither pretty nor ugly6/10 above average; (when I’m hunting, I don’t just want anaverage girl, so 6/10 is lowest I will accept)7/10 moderately attractive8/10 “head-turner” pretty (eg/ the typical guy will turn tolook at her on the street)9/10 celebrity and supermodel level of beauty, very rarelyfound in Toronto hunting grounds10/10 theoretical limit for attractiveness, never seenbefore My scoring guide for attitude & service0/10 theoretical limit for bad service, never reached1-2/10 absolute terrible attitude and service, every wasbad, nothing was good3-4/10 bad attitude or service, very unsatisfied5/10 bare pass, attitude and service was acceptable, nofeeling of joy or regret afterwards6/10 good7/10 very good, include some highlights8/10 excellent, everything done well plus some highlights,worth repeating9/10 super awesome experience that will be remembered forlife10/10 theoretical limit for good (perfect) service, neverreached