late review for Lucia@BH

I tried Lucia last week. Everything was fine, but I just had the feeling I wasn't totally satisfied. Thought about it a long time. Service was good, I couldn't find anything that I was unhappy with. She look good, not 10/10 but still at least a 7 or 8 which is the score I would give to a moderately pretty girl. Her body is at least 8 or higher. She's got nice legs, firm butt, slim waist, nowhere flabby, nice B cups, good skin, no tattoos, non smoker. If we used the elementary school report card format to rate her, she would be good to excellent in all areas. So why this feeling that I wasn't totally thrilled after my session? Then it dawned on me. Superstars like Cathy, Emma, Roxy, Janet have spoiled me. Reading the reviews here, I think there are many bros in the same boat. After having a taste of these superstars, all other girls just seem very mediocre in comparison. Especially for newbies. If the first MM they try is Cathy, then forget about hunting anymore, nothing else will measure up. It is like having a Ferrari as your very first car and then using that as your benchmark for every car afterwards. Or another example is Kobe beef for the very first steak you eat in your entire life, you will never satisfied with anything else, a nice steak dinner from The Keg will taste like crap. So getting back to the point. I think Cathy & other superstars have ruined the market. They set the bar way too high for others to follow. Comparative Scores: Lucia vs Emma vs Cathy Face: 8(L), 9(E), 8.5(C) Body: 8.5(L), 8.5(E), 8(C) Service: 8(L), 9.5(E), 9.5(C) Attitude: 8(L), 9.5(E), 9.9(C)