Daisy @ PG - meh

I saw Daisy based on the positive reviews on her. I would agree with the reviews in terms of the services and altitude she provided were accurate for the most part but I think I would definitely disagree on the looks department. Either ppl were shilling or something. Unfortunately for me, I felt her looks were different from what I expected. Looks: 7/10 - Older than I anticipated Body: 8/10, fairly slim with a few fat marks Service: 8/10 , As advertised and energetic but I don't think she didn't take the initiative to give me CIM (I didn't get it) so I think she only provides it, if instructed to. Speaks and understands little English. Repeat: No Unless the bar has gone down a lot, I felt Daisy was a lot older than I anticipated and was not my MCOT. She's at least 30 plus and possibly 40 or a lot more unless she did not age gracefully at all or has some skin problems. I could be wrong but it really bothered me a lot when someone looks older than anticipated. Conclusion: When you see good reviews in December and see rimming specifically mentioned in the advertisement, it should raise some red flags. I think I stick with Fair instead. I know she's not the best looking girl but at least she's still young. Note: I mentioned services and altitude was as specified but looks really bothered me a lot.