Bebe @ TOE88

hihi all, just want to give this review since it is still fresh in memory.  it's my first review, hope brothers can find this helpful... in my short but plentiful experience, i would like to think i have seen my share of the bitter... from mm's that look like a drug user (sickly and horribly malnourished skin tone,  tired and sunken eye sockets), mm's that have masculine features (unproportionally large skull, strong wide jawbone),  mm's that had unsightly fat ripples on their stomachs and thunder thighs, mm's that reaked of cigarettes, to mm's that had large troubling purple bruises on their legs, knees, and arms...  what doesn't kill you can only make you stronger... so all those girls that didn't look so pretty before, well, now they look pretty to me!!! haha! first off, here are my likes and dislikes: for face: the face is very crucial for me.  generally i would say it accounts for 90% importance for me.  she doesn't have to be a super model, but i do have to find her appealing to some degree at-the-very-least. example of a hot looking mm to me:  Elaina (Vianna) @ TOE88 example of a not hot but good enough (to shoot!) looking mm:  Caroline @ Babyface example of an unattractive looking mm to me:  June @ Babyface for body: tall and slender body type.  in cantonese this would be "goh goh sau sau" type! all other preferences: i don't like the smell of cigarettes at all -- this is a big turn-off.  if all else is well, dfk only adds to the experience... unfortunately, i have yet to be with an asian mm that gave good dfk.  the best dfk i had was with a russian mm.  great dfk is required to truly have the GFE, imho.  a good bbbj to me is a wet and slutty one, gentle, fast, kisses, lots of BLS, lots of licking the shaft, lots of DT, a bit of teeth is fine for me, basically she has to treat it like eating and licking a delicious popsickle on a hot day.  moans should be realistic (either loud or soft), but not obviously fake and contrived. ====== Bebe @ TOE88 review ====== mm link:  http://toe88.com/baby.php photo representation comments: the photo shows a slender figure and light complexion, but in reality the mm was chubby, hips were a lot wider than expected, upper thighs were chubby, and skin tone was a lot darker than expected. photo verdict:  yes, i feel i have been mislead by the photo face: 6.0 body: 6.0 attitude: 8.0, nice girl, really friendly and sweet, easy to talk to service: 6.5, bbbj really needs work (very short, too gentle and apprehensive about it) damage: $300 (1 hr) repeat: no comments:  unfortunately she was not MCOT.  her SF2 before and after was good, and we chatted a lot.  she is a nice girl, happy and easy to talk to.  her skin is smooth and she seems young (early 20's).  bbbj lasted about 2 minutes, no licking, no BLS, no DT, too gentle.  during missionary i liked how she held me tightly, and her moans were acceptable.  but definitely the photo is not representative of her, imho.